MESmerize | Platform for Calcium Imaging analysis | Data Visualization library

You would see what you expected if you printed the bytes making up the wchar_t values correctly, or if you just skipped that and printed their values without trying to break them up into bytes:

Have you tried to reset the chatbot's persistent menu? This can be done with sending a POST HTTP request to Facebook Messenger API as explained here:

https://developers.facebook.com/docs/messenger-platform/send-messages/persistent-menu

i think you are searching for eval function :

Python eval() The eval() method parses the expression passed to this method and runs python expression (code) within the program.

In simple terms, the eval() method runs the python code (which is passed as an argument) within the program.

The syntax of eval() is:

fuzzywuzzy uses Levenshtein distance which means it does compare all characters including spaces and symbols such as ':'.

partial_ratio compares two strings, but it is allowed to cut the longer string to the length of the shorter string.

In your case, shorter string is 'ja rule:mesmerize' with length 17. When the string is compared, longer string is cut to that size.

With this information in mind, let's compare your outputs. We can see that the first long string does not have : in the end of 'ja rule' but the second one does. There are many possible other factors, but this could be the main reason for your outcome.

I'm sure more careful analysis will reveal more about the score. The implementation of patial_ratio is found here https://github.com/seatgeek/fuzzywuzzy/blob/master/fuzzywuzzy/fuzz.py#L34.

Looking at the theme, it seems a bit overly complex in how it determines the hero title. If there's no override options in the theme (I didn't install it to check), there does appear to a mesmerize_header_title filter you can hook into, it's apparently how they change the title on WooCommerce pages natively in the theme.

One thing to note is that there can be many categories on a post, so typically you'll only want to show the first one. We can use get_the_category() to return an array of WP_Term objects, and apply the first one to the header title filter:

You're modifying the array as you "iterate" over it.

You are actually iterating over the range 0 until tmpArray.length, which is calculated up front. At some point, you reduce the length of the array (or, I assume so, as I can't find remove on the Array class). But it's still going to continue the iteration up to whatever the last index was when you created the range.

When you uncomment the inner for block, you're making it recompute the range for each step of the outer for. And it just so happens that the j range will simply have nothing in it if i >= tmpArray.length. So it inadvertently guards against that failure.

This is very C-style (imperative) code. It looks like all you're trying to do is remove some items from an array. That's what filter is for.

Pids have invisible part called creation:

http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/2014-September/081178.html

In case of node restarts this invisible part can change and it is actually a good thing, because that might be completely other Pid now. It is problematic that they are shown as the same thing when printed. To see that they are actually different, you can use term_to_binary and check last byte.

Creation is always 0 on local node and 1, 2 or 3 when it is a remote pid. When you send pids between nodes they are automatically translated, but if you for example store them as string and then build them back with list_to_pid creation will be 0 and the pids won't compare.